<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://forums.obdev.at/app.php/feed/topic/9217" />

	<title>Objective Development Forums</title>
	
	<link href="https://forums.obdev.at/index.php" />
	<updated>2014-07-26T01:14:39+02:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[Objective Development Forums]]></name></author>
	<id>https://forums.obdev.at/app.php/feed/topic/9217</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[blargg]]></name></author>
		<updated>2014-07-26T01:14:39+02:00</updated>

		<published>2014-07-26T01:14:39+02:00</published>
		<id>https://forums.obdev.at/viewtopic.php?t=9217&amp;p=27791#p27791</id>
		<link href="https://forums.obdev.at/viewtopic.php?t=9217&amp;p=27791#p27791"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: ATTINY441]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forums.obdev.at/viewtopic.php?t=9217&amp;p=27791#p27791"><![CDATA[
You can use a pin change interrupt for V-USB.<br /><br />Pullups shouldn't matter since I'm pretty sure that V-USB doesn't ever need them. That is, it either runs the USB pins as outputs or non-pulled-up inputs.<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forums.obdev.at/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=20076">blargg</a> — Sat Jul 26, 2014 1:14 am</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[psc]]></name></author>
		<updated>2014-07-25T18:55:58+02:00</updated>

		<published>2014-07-25T18:55:58+02:00</published>
		<id>https://forums.obdev.at/viewtopic.php?t=9217&amp;p=27780#p27780</id>
		<link href="https://forums.obdev.at/viewtopic.php?t=9217&amp;p=27780#p27780"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: ATTINY441]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forums.obdev.at/viewtopic.php?t=9217&amp;p=27780#p27780"><![CDATA[
What I'm worried about is that XTAL2 is the same pins as INT0.<br />Will also use SPI, then on what pins I should connect D+ / D-?<br /><br />From a post on avr freaks:<br />Rather than enabling pullups by setting bits in the PORTx register, the tiny841 has a separate PUEx register.<br /><br />Any hints?<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forums.obdev.at/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1494">psc</a> — Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:55 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[psc]]></name></author>
		<updated>2014-07-25T17:43:31+02:00</updated>

		<published>2014-07-25T17:43:31+02:00</published>
		<id>https://forums.obdev.at/viewtopic.php?t=9217&amp;p=27779#p27779</id>
		<link href="https://forums.obdev.at/viewtopic.php?t=9217&amp;p=27779#p27779"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[ATTINY441]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forums.obdev.at/viewtopic.php?t=9217&amp;p=27779#p27779"><![CDATA[
Can anyone confirm that this &quot;new&quot; ATTINY is supported by VUSB:<br /><!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.atmel.ca/devices/ATTINY441.aspx">http://www.atmel.ca/devices/ATTINY441.aspx</a><!-- m --><br /><br />Thanks for your time!<br />Cheers<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forums.obdev.at/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=1494">psc</a> — Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:43 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
