<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://forums.obdev.at/app.php/feed/topic/2414" />

	<title>Objective Development Forums</title>
	
	<link href="https://forums.obdev.at/index.php" />
	<updated>2009-03-23T14:36:03+02:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[Objective Development Forums]]></name></author>
	<id>https://forums.obdev.at/app.php/feed/topic/2414</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[mojo]]></name></author>
		<updated>2009-03-23T14:36:03+02:00</updated>

		<published>2009-03-23T14:36:03+02:00</published>
		<id>https://forums.obdev.at/viewtopic.php?t=2414&amp;p=8453#p8453</id>
		<link href="https://forums.obdev.at/viewtopic.php?t=2414&amp;p=8453#p8453"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Internal RC oscillator 16.5MHz reliability &amp; compatibili]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://forums.obdev.at/viewtopic.php?t=2414&amp;p=8453#p8453"><![CDATA[
I am working on an open source project that I hope to produce kits for eventually. I am tempted to use an ATTiny461 with the internal oscillator and self calibration because it would allow me to cram the whole thing into a much smaller and cheaper case.<br /><br />The problem is that I can't find any data on the reliability and compatibility of the 16.5MHz RC oscillator mode. There are a fair number of people saying it works, but can anyone say they have tested it in the long term and on a wide variety of machines?<br /><br />Please don't get me wrong, it's not that I doubt it works, I just need some hard data before committing hard cash to it <img class="smilies" src="./../../../images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://forums.obdev.at/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=892">mojo</a> — Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:36 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
